Introduction
If you are a government employee, you have probably seen the headline by now. R18.2 billion, lost by the pension fund, across 23 different companies. And if you saw it, you have likely caught yourself wondering what it actually means for your money.
Most government employees do not say this question out loud, but it sits there quietly. Is my pension safe. Should I change my exit plans. Is now the wrong time to think about resigning or retiring, or does it change nothing at all.
This article walks through five things every government employee should understand about how this fund actually works, why a loss like this does not show up on your statement right away, and what it means for the timing of your exit, whether you are planning to resign or planning to retire.
No panic here. Just a clear, calm explanation of what is actually happening and what to do with that information, so you can make your own decision from a place of understanding rather than fear, on your own timeline, not the news cycle’s.
What’s Actually Happening
The pension fund recently confirmed a loss of R18.2 billion across 23 company investments. This kind of news naturally raises questions for anyone who has spent years, or decades, contributing to the fund and relying on it for their future.
What matters most is not the headline itself, but how this fund is structured and how losses like this eventually reach individual members, if at all, and when. That is what the rest of this article explains, step by step, in plain language.
Understanding this structure is the difference between reacting to a headline in the moment and making a calm, well timed decision about your own exit, whether that exit is years away or closer than you think right now.
Number One: Your Pension Works on a Formula, Not the Market
The pension fund is what is known as a defined benefit fund. That means your lump sum, your monthly pension, and your resignation benefit are all calculated using a set formula, not by tracking a share price day to day.
This is different from a defined contribution fund, such as a retirement annuity or a unit trust investment. In those, your value moves up and down with the market in real time. You can watch it happen, for better or worse, almost daily, and it can feel unsettling.
In a defined benefit fund like this one, the formula sits between you and the market. Part of that formula accounts for your years of service, which means more time in service generally means a higher value, regardless of what the underlying investments are doing in any given month.
This structure is intentional. It gives government employees a level of predictability that a purely market linked product cannot offer, which is part of why the fund has historically felt safer than other forms of investment, and why so many government employees have never needed to think closely about market movements at all.
The takeaway is simple. Your pension is not directly exposed to daily market swings the way a retirement annuity is, because the formula manages that exposure on your behalf.
Number Two: A Loss Like This Does Not Show Up Immediately
Here is the part that surprises most government employees. If you compare your pension statement today to one from six months or a year ago, your value has likely still gone up, even during periods when investments performed poorly.
That is because the investment performance sits behind the scenes. The formula absorbs it. Your statement reflects the formula’s output, not the raw investment result, so a loss like the recent R18.2 billion does not appear on your statement the moment it happens.
This is not the fund hiding anything from you. It is simply how a defined benefit structure works. But it does mean government employees need a different way of tracking what is really happening with their pension, since the statement alone will not tell the full story in real time.
For most of your working life, this masking effect is not something you need to think about closely. It becomes far more relevant in the months leading up to your exit, which is exactly why this article exists, and exactly why the timing questions in the next two sections matter so much.
The takeaway is that your statement can look stable while a real loss is quietly working its way through the system behind it.
Number Three: The Fund Adjusts Its Formula Every Three Years
Roughly every three years, the pension fund carries out an actuarial assessment. In simple terms, it checks whether there is enough money to pay every member what the formula promises, based on how investments have actually performed since the last review.
When there is enough money, no changes are made. When there is not, the formula gets adjusted, which can reduce resignation benefits and slow the growth of pension increases. This happened in 2022 and again in 2025, and the next assessment is expected in 2028.
This is the mechanism by which a loss like the recent one eventually reaches individual members, even though it takes time to show up. It is also the reason the timing of these three yearly assessments matters so much for anyone weighing an exit in the years ahead, rather than just reacting to this week’s headline.
Knowing this pattern exists, and roughly when it tends to happen, is the single most useful piece of planning information most government employees have never been told directly.
The takeaway is that the effects of today’s loss are more likely to surface at the next formula change than in your statement this month.
Number Four: Timing Your Exit Around the Formula Change Matters
If you are planning to resign, leaving before a formula change generally means leaving while your value is at its highest point. Government employees who exited just before the 2022 and 2025 adjustments were not affected by the reductions that followed.
After a formula change, it typically takes twelve to eighteen months for values to recover, sometimes longer depending on the size of the adjustment. If your pension value drops from five million to four and a half million, for example, it can take a year or more to work its way back up to where it started.
If you are planning to retire rather than resign, the concern shifts slightly. Pension increases are typically capped well below the actual cost of living increases you see elsewhere, so it becomes important to have your gratuity benefits set aside as a buffer against that gap over time, rather than assuming your monthly pension alone will keep pace.
Neither of these situations calls for a rushed decision. They call for a clear timeline, built around the formula change cycle rather than around the headline of the week, ideally mapped out a year or more in advance.
The takeaway is that the safest window to exit, if resignation is your plan, is generally before a formula change takes effect, not after.
Number Five: There Is a Way to Reduce This Uncertainty
Because government employees are used to seeing their pension value move steadily upward, a sudden shift into a fully market linked investment can feel unsettling, especially when markets are volatile and headlines like this one are in circulation.
That is why a blended solution exists, one that includes a level of capital protection alongside growth, built specifically with government employees in mind. It is designed to smooth out the experience so a difficult market period does not translate into a steep, visible decline in your statement, the way it might in a purely market linked product.
This is not a guarantee that markets will always perform well, and no responsible advisor should ever promise that. It is a structure designed to manage that uncertainty in a way that feels closer to what government employees are already used to from their pension.
The right fit depends entirely on your own numbers, your years of service, and how close you are to your own exit date, which is exactly the kind of detail worth walking through individually rather than applying generically to everyone.
The takeaway is that you do not have to choose between the stability you are used to and having your money work harder for you.
Your Next Step
If you have read this far, you are already the kind of government employee who plans ahead rather than reacting to a headline. That instinct matters more than most people realise, especially with a formula change on the horizon in 2028.
Everything above gives you the framework. It explains how the formula works, why the effects of a loss like this take time to surface, and how the three year assessment cycle should shape your own exit timeline, whether that exit is a resignation or a retirement.
The full video goes further, walking through the numbers in more detail, unpacking the formula change pattern visually, and answering the question every government employee is quietly asking right now, in Dhevan’s own words.
Watch the full video and register for The Retire vs Resign Masterclass™
No panic. No fluff. Just the truth.
Watch the full video and book your VIP consult:
Join The Retire vs Resign Masterclass™
